Friday, September 26, 2008
Chapter 5
In Chapter 5, four different models of curriculum development are presented: "The Tyler Model", "The Taba Model", "The Saylor, Alexander, and Lewis Model", and “The Olivia Model.” Could you use the Tyler Model to lead effective curriculum development in your current school? Which ISLLC standards are related to using this model?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
39 comments:
A feel that the Tyler Model could be used in my school. I think as a teacher it is your job to look at the learner before planning anything. You have to know what your students know and need to know before the planning begins. I alos feel that you have to know what your children are going to home to every night to set your expectations. Obvousily you have to know that material that is going to be taught. In my school, my grade level and a few others go on home visits during the summer to see where the children are coming from and meet them on their turf so to speak. I also think that it in my school we feel that everyone can learn and we share similiar values in education whichis important for the students. This model has to do with the following ISLLC Standards:
1. vision-we want all children to learn
2.instructional programs-how we decide what to teach when and how to acutally teach the material.
4. Community- looking in the community and the society in the area.
6. Big Picture-knowing what could go wrong and hwo this may or may not work in the building.
Iagree with Loren regarding the ISSLC standards that are being used in this model. In reading the Tyler model, I could envision this as the approach that we use at my school. We definitely are a student oriented school and due to the small size of our school system the community needs play an important role in the development of any curricular decisions. Although, we do not have a curriculum specialist in our school, all teachers are responsible for developing a pacing guide based on not only the SOL's but subject matter within the adopted textbook series.
I believe it could be used in my school, especially with the upper grade levels. It would involve something new, but I feel the staff in place here would be willing to try something new. I've always liked the idea of involving students in school based decisions to give them ownership. As Loren points out, the environment our students live in can greatly affect their education, and this model of planning takes that into consideration. Obviously there will be a great range from student to student in this area.
ISLLC Standards: One (vision), Two (instructional program and culture), Four (internal and external community),Six (big picture including social aspects) and to a lesser degree Three (Management).
Yes, I think I could use the Tyler Model to lead a school in curriculum development...... especially if I used the expanded model. As a curriculum leader, I think that I need to "buy in" to the model that I am going to use with the other developers. I do think it is important use use students, society, and the subject matter as sources for identifying the general objectives and it is important to take them through the screen identified. But more important, I would use the additional pieces of the model Tyler outlined folling the instructional objectives. Selection, organization, etc. are all important steps in the planning process, but I feel the most important piece is the evaluation step. You need to constantly evaluate pieces of the curriculum, lessons, instructional practices, to improve any curriculum.
I think that the Tyler Model would work in my school. It is important to put the students first. Taking into consideration their needs--educational, social, physical, psychological, etc.--it would be useful in the planning stages of curriculum development.
I agree with Diane in regards to evaluation. Evaluation of instruction and evaluation of curriculum are necessary to the development process. Society changes, therefore, students change. Because of this, evaluation must be an ongoing component.
ISLLC standards: 1(vision); 2(school culture/instructional programs); 4(community); 5(integrity/fairness/ethics; 6(big picture)
I believe that the Tyler Model could be used in my school district. I appreciate that Tyler gathers data from the learners, external factors, and the subject matter being taught. I like that Tyler examines the needs and interests of the student as well as the needs of society. Students are more apt to learn from an educator that knows, understands, and can relate to their students, parents, and community. After the objectives have been identified the process takes us through two screens: philosophical and psychological. The curriculum can then be developed to address changes in human beings, goals, and the time it takes to attain the objectives. I believe that the curriculum we teach must be beneficial to the future of our students and to the society in which they live. If we know our students and our community we can serve them better. The ISLLC Standards addressed are #1 Vision, #2 Instruction, #4 Community, and #6 Big Picture.
I believe it could be possible to use the Tyler Model in my school. It would be difficult to to use time wise; gathering data on all the different sources from the student background information, observation and interviews,etc. The second source,which is society, would be needs and interests of the community. The subject matter is essential in all curriculum, one would think! The philsosphical screen should be your vision. The psychological screen could be the culture and learning environment. So, yes I do believe one could integrate the Tyler Model into their own school. The following ISLLC Standards are associated:
1. vision-
2.instructional programs-when where and how
4. Community- involving the community in instructional programs6. Big Picture-realizing anything can happen that will have a negative impact on you and your students.
I agree with Anita that the Tyler model would definitely be time consuming. But, I also agree that it could definitely work. Looking at all parts of what makes up our students and how they learn is very important when creating a curriculum. All students are different and it's important to create a curriculum with those differences in mind. It is also imnportant to take in the value of trends within society. The goal of teaching is to prepare young people for their future.
I agree that ISLCC standards 1, 2, and 4 clearly are associated with this model.
I believe that the Tyler model could be used at my school. To some extent, I like involving the students in the decsion making process. I also believe that it is important to know each student and thier enviornment. Obvioulsy, there is no model that will take into consideration each childs circumstances.Depending on how you look at it will determine which ISLLC standards you think fit this model. ISLLC standards: 1(vision); 2(school culture/instructional programs); 4(community); 5(integrity/fairness/ethics; 6(big picture).
Clay Moran
I definitely believe that the Tyler model for curriculum development could be implemented in schools. An important aspect of this model is being aware of your students and I view that as teachers we need to know the knowledge our students come in with, as well as other factors that may impact their education. I like that Tyler examines the needs and interests of the student and also of the society. In addition, it takes into account the subject matter itself. I think this model encourages evaluation of instruction and evaluation of curriculum, which are necessary in the development process. Societal expectations and focuses change so the students change and adapt. I believe that this model demonstrates that curriculum development and evaluation of the curriculum is an ongoing process.
ISLLC Standards: # 1 Vision, # 2 Instructional Programs and Culture, # 4 Community, # 6 Big Picture.
I agree with most everyone. The Tyler model could be used. I find it very interesting and useful to get information from the learner. I completely agree with several of the postings already that the childs home environment could totally affect thm and their education. This is the most compassionate model in terms of considering the learner and their environment Applying this model would be something new and we would have to give it a try.
I think that ISLLC standards that are most applicable are 1,2, 4 and 6
I think the Tyler Model could play an important role in my school. Students, society, and the subject matter itself could play a vital role in developing curriculum. This model addresses the needs and knowledge of students and society, as well as the disciplines to create goals. Often, we do not consider enough the needs of individual children, and this model aims to address that.
Curriculum should be constantly evaluated and changed if needed to better address the educational philosophy and the psychology of learning screens.
The ISSLCs addresses are 1, 2, 4, and 6.
I believe that we are beginning to use the more prescriptive approach that Tyler's Model advocates in my school. Our move toward implementing RtI where learner behavior is measured in terms of growth moves us even closer to this curriculum model. I believe that ISLLC standards 1, 2, 4, and 6 are referenced, but like Jenny, I would also include ISLLC 5. The educational leader will demonstrate the ability to combine impartiality, sensitivity to student diversity, and ethical considerations in their interactions with others.
Yes, and I would consider our current curriculum model to be very similar to the Tyler model. Our pacing and curriculum guides are directly correlated to the Virginia Standards of Learning, and restate the standards and each strand verbum.
ISLLC standards 1, 2, 4, and 6.
I believe the Tyler Model has already left a mark on the school system in which I work. Allowing those who will be directly affected by all decisions regarding curriculum to participate in the development and planning is essential for ownership. ISLLC standards 1, 2, 4, and 6.
Yes, I do think this model could be used to lead effective curriculum development. The models focuses on important factors such as gathering data,, making and refining objectives, and development through evaluation of learning experiences. A very important aspect of developing curriculum is being reflective and looking at the needs of the learners. I like that this model reflects both on the objectives and learning activities/experiences. The ISLLC standards related to this model are 1,2,4, and 6.
Yes, I do think this model could be used to lead effective curriculum development. The models focuses on important factors such as gathering data,, making and refining objectives, and development through evaluation of learning experiences. A very important aspect of developing curriculum is being reflective and looking at the needs of the learners. I like that this model reflects both on the objectives and learning activities/experiences. The ISLLC standards related to this model are 1,2,4, and 6.
I could see using the Tyler Expanded Model at school to lead effective curriculum development. I like using the students, society and subject matter as the sources for the objectives. I think this model allows you to take student interests and needs into account as well as examine the "meat" of the subjects to see what is essential for students to learn. If followed from the beginning to the end, this model allows for thorough planning with many checks along the way. The ISLLC standards covered are: 1 (Vision); 2 (School culture); 3 (Management - in that you are managing the curriculum council to develop the curriculum); 4 (Community and Family); and 6 (the Big Picture).
I too think that the Tyler Model could be used in my school. I like the way that it seemingly puts students first and takes into consideration where students are coming from. I like that it looks at a variety of issues that may concern student success(educational, psychological, social...)and takes those into consideration as a means of developing curriculum.
I think the ISLLCs that are present here are #1 vision, #2 instructional program and school culture, #4 community, #5 ethical, fair, and honest, and #6 the Big Picture.
I agree with all the previous statement that the Tyler model could be used. In fact I think it is the easies to used. It takes into account what I feel can effect curriculum the most, student needs, societies needs and the subject. ISSLC 1-visioning, 2school culture/instructional programs, 6 big picture
I feel that the Tyler model could be used in my school district to lead curriculum development. I like the thought of creating goals and objectives based on the needs of students, the society or community and the subject matter. And based on this model, teachers are then able to develop appropriate instructional objectives to meet the needs of their students. The ISSLC standards that support this model is 1)vision, 2)school culture and instructional programs, 3)management of the organizations operations, and 4)responding to the diverse needs of the community.
The Tyler model has been used in our school system over the tenure of my employment. It is less applicable today and far less balanced than in the past. The emphasis has shifted to more involvement by government in the choices about curriculum content. ISLLCs 1&2.
As everyone else has stated, the Tyler Model could be used by anyone whose goals are to approach curriculum development with the intent of involving all stakeholders, students, families,community,teachers,and subject matter specialists. The screening process furthers the promotion of shared vision and the psychological screen utilizes the teacher's experience and expertise, refining and focusing on strategic and attainable objectives. With that being said, I think it would be wise to use the Tyler Model for curriculum development. I wouldn't go so far as to say this approach would be "revolutionary" at my school,but some aspects of it would certainly be viewed as innovative and new. Also, as state by others, I would associate ISSLC Standard 1 (vision), Standard 2 (school culture and instructional program), and Standard 4 (collaborating with families and community members)with using this model.
As many have stated already, I feel that students should be part of the curriculum development process. This is especially true of the high school students, however it would be difficult to have student involvement in the elementary grades. The elementary student should be included in the some capacity but not as much as a high school student. High school students could give some incite on how their peers would view the proposed curriculum. Members of the community including parents are a must in the curriculum selection process since it is their child and the community that will be affected most by it.
There are several ISLLC standards that are in play for this. The standards are one (vision of the school), two (the culture of the school), four (community involvement) and six (the big picture is also affected)
I do believe that the Tyler Model could be used as a model for curriculum development at my school. I do agree with many of you, saying that this model could be time consuming but taking the time to use the student as a source definently empowering the student. I think the educational system has always used society as a source and will continue do so. The ISLLC standards related to this model are 1,2,4, and 6.
The Tyler Model could be used to lead effective curriculum development in my school. Gathering data from all stakeholders (even students) will not only empower, but give curriculum planners the best data with which to develop the instructional objectives.
ISLLC 1,2,4, and 6.
I believe that the Tyler Model can be used at my school. Tyler recommends that curricula be taken from three sources:the learners, social life outside the school, and the subject matter. All of these can be gleaned from each of the schools that I teach at. Certainly the students can give their input. The social life of the entire school community can be easily included. And the subject matter can be used to develope the curricula.
ISLLC standards that will be uised in this endeavor will be 1 (vision), 2 (instructional program),4 (diverse community), and 6 (big picture).
I think the Tyler model could be used, with some slight expansion, in any school. There is great value in examining students, society, and discipline. It is imperative to understand the big picture (ISLLC 6) and have the knowledge and skills to use that knowledge to improving student learning and achievement. I also like the simplicity and flow of the model.
I think the Tyler Model could be used in my school. Most curriculum development seems to be left up to the teachers. I'm not sure how many teachers in my school actually have a plan for developing curriculum.
I feel the following ISLLC standards apply: ISLLC 1 and all sub standards, ISLLC 2 and all sub standards, ISLLC 4.1 and 4.2, ISLLC 5.3, and ISLLC 6.1 and 6.2
Yes, but how often do we develop curriculum within the school walls? Most curriculum is dictated by the department of ed only allowing teachers to develop objectives to achieve this curriculum. Also, an understating of the psychology of learning is necessary in this model. Sure most of us will/have taken a class on this but how many people actually understand it well enough to implement in the creation of curriculum? The state could possibly use the Tyler Model in the development of a statewide curriculum.
ISLLC Standards Used: 1 Vision, 2 Instructional Programs, 4 Communities, and 6 Big Picture.
Yes, I beleive the Tyler Model could be used within my school system. We are a data driven profession these days, where I have seen throught various committee work that we are having to evaluate the whole child in order to improve student achievement. I feel this is important as many others have stated to understand a child and the situation or situations they may be experiencing on a daily basis with they are not at school with you.
ISLLC's 1,2,4,6
The Tyler Model could be used in most school environments. The Tyler model addresses the aims of education and the systemic belief about learning. I believe these are crucial elements in curriculum development.
The Tyler Model demostrates the 1 st, 2nd, and 4th ISSLC Standard.
I think that the Saylor model is the most reasonable in terms of practicality. I like how it outlines three broad categories (Design, Implementation, and Evaluation) and bases the "curriculum plan" on lots of smaller plans. To me, that makes it easier to break the curriculum development process down into components that be carried by smaller groups (or even individuals). The other three models are so detailed and comprehensive that they might seem overwhelming to teachers, administrators, etc.
I agree with Diane that the expanded model would work most effectively in the school I currently teach in. I feel that using data from the sources of student, society, and subject is essential. Also, there is a sense of ownership once members of a school determine the philosphies for which the possible objectives will be screened through. I also appreciate the key words and related concepts of "precise" inst objectives, "organization", "direction", and "eval". Many teachers within my school already find these idealogies to be important and a part of their own development.
Amanda Morgan
Yes, I believe we could use the Tyler Model for effective curriculum development in our school. Without prior knowledge, we have been using parts of the model in creating remedila plans for students who are either borderline failure or who are simply new to our school or state and have not had the material necessary to pass the SOL tests. This model has been effective for us to create indiviual plans of remediation as well as class plans for students in those broad areas they are having difficulties.
ISLLC 1 vision, 2 instruction, 4 community, 3 management in finding the resources to carry the plan out, and 6 big picture
The Tyler Model is a pretty standard and straightforward model so I see no reason why it couldn't be used in my school. It would seem that it would be easy to become bogged down in writing learning objectives and evaluating them. So one might want to spend a little less time in that area if possible. I believe that it most relates to ISLCC 2.2 providing an effective instructional program; particularly, as it relates to accommodating learner's diverse needs.
I agree with many of you that the Tyler Model could be used in our school. I favor involving the three sources to establish the starting point. I favor the society piece, because this is the main reason curriculum develops and planners continue to improve the curriculum. It stems from the changes of society.
ISSLC 1 Vison, 2 Curriculum/Instruction, 4 Communities, and 6 Big picuture
Yes, I believe the Tyler Model could be used to lead effetive curriculum development in my current school system. I believe curriculum should be based on student needs and desires. It is extremely difficult to teach concepts to students when they cannot relate to what is being taught. We need to connect what we are teaching to our students. Once we do this, they should take a more active role in their learning making the learning process a more meaningful experience.
The blog above was mine. Pressed "enter" before I typed my name! Yes, I believe the Tyler Model could be used to lead effetive curriculum development in my current school system. I believe curriculum should be based on student needs and desires. It is extremely difficult to teach concepts to students when they cannot relate to what is being taught. We need to connect what we are teaching to our students. Once we do this, they should take a more active role in their learning making the learning process a more meaningful experience
Post a Comment